Preaching the Gospel in Season and Out
Hopefully, everyone in that instance would agree that the child remains innocent and ought not to be murdered.
Once you agree on that in your discussion on abortion, you then ask your counterpart the crucial follow-up question when “Trotting Out a Toddler:” if the two-week-old baby ought not to be murdered, then why should the innocent baby in the womb be killed in the case of rape (or incest)?
[click to continue...]“If unborn life must be denied, its incriminating witness, language, must be denied with it,” DeMarco points out. Thus, pro-abortion advocates have to change their language to hide (from themselves?) their true motives. Not only do they have to dehumanize the unborn baby by calling him or her a ‘fetus,’ but they also have to pretend to themselves that social interconnectedness does not exist.
[click to continue...]Pro-life hero and leader of Priests for Life, Fr. Frank Pavone makes a profound realization in his book, “Abolishing Abortion: How You Can Play a Part in Ending the Greatest Evil of Our Day.” He explains how the US government usurped God’s authority to take a life with the Supreme Court decision, Roe v. Wade.
[click to continue...]Say what you will about the man. But to steal a phrase from former VP Joe Biden, it remains “a big [expletive] deal” that the 45th President of these United States addressed the 45th Annual March for Life in Washington, DC.
[click to continue...]The right-to-life movement would be essentially erased, if pro-life advocates adopt Renkl’s short-sighted supposed solution.
Let’s begin by observing the most obvious error in her thinking. That is, by agreeing to not talk about the issues of abortion, contraception, so-called “gay marriage,” L.G.B.T. issues, and so forth, we would thus guarantee their further decaying of our culture. Only by shining a light into the darkness of sinful behavior does such behavior ever end. “Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them,” the Bible instructs (Eph 5:11).
[click to continue...]Effective language and rhetoric used by those supporting the Culture of Life is, of course, a matter of speaking the truth. When pro-lifers speak plainly, we very often prick the conscious of those who support abortion. When someone gets stung at the level of their conscience, naturally they get defensive and spout nonsensical rebuttals. This is to be expected, like the charge that pro-life people use ‘inflammatory’ language.
[click to continue...]He thinks the legality of abortion ought to be left up to the individual states. He thinks we should live in a democracy in which each state should determine by popular vote whether it should be legal to murder the unborn.
[click to continue...]Wonderful, Ms. Fisher is now cancer-free, praise God.
Only, the lie is that Planned Parenthood does not treat women for cancer.
Heck, Planned Parenthood doesn’t even do mammograms, despite what Democrat politicians and Planned Parenthood executives falsely claim.
[click to continue...]If you’re unborn and an inconvenience, then you don’t have any “right” to exist any longer. If you’re old and too much of a burden, you become dispensable.
In essence, we live in a culture where certain people can decide certain other people’s lives are expendable.
[click to continue...]This case is about more than just conscientious objection. We are talking about abortifacients here. It is no coincidence that a medical professional’s legal right to conscience rights ended at the door step of abortion.
[click to continue...]
![It is “A Big [Expletive] Deal” President Trump Addressed the 45th Annual March for Life](https://i1.wp.com/prolife365.com/wp-content/uploads/annual-march-for-life.jpg?resize=348%2C145)
